QuickCursor — Your favorite text editor anywhere.

QuickCursor

Your favorite text editor anywhere.

For Mac users who want to use their favorite text editor everywhere. QuickCursor allows you to edit text from any application in your favorite text editor*. QuickCursor provides a standard open source solution that doesn’t require input manager hacks to work.

useful, especially as the dreaded textmate input managers don’t work with snow leopard (dont want to switch to 32bit mode for that),
still have to wait for this to become mature…

MagicPrefs is a must download for Magic Mouse owners

Filed under: Software, Odds and ends, Freeware

MagicPrefs is a must download for Magic Mouse owners

by Mel Martin (RSS feed) on Dec 31st 2009 at 6:00PM

We know the Magic Mouse is selling well. I was one of the many who was pretty excited when I heard about it and grabbed one the first week it was out. When I actually went to use it, however, it was a major downer. On my Mac Pro the tracking was erratic, slow, and pretty unusable. I wasn’t the only person reporting this. I put the mouse on my shelf of forgotten tech until a friend told me about MagicPrefs.

memcached – a distributed memory object caching system

What is Memcached?

Free & open source, high-performance, distributed memory object caching system, generic in nature, but intended for use in speeding up dynamic web applications by alleviating database load.

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

Memcached is simple yet powerful. Its simple design promotes quick deployment, ease of development, and solves many problems facing large data caches. Its API is available for most popular languages.

 

Mercurial vs Git « 503 Service Unavailable

Edit from 2009-04-10: as time passes and I receive feedback, this article is being refined and modified subtly to remove typos, make concepts more clear, or clarify when something is not really needed. Special thanks to Martin Geisler for pointing out my mistakes related to Mercurial.

There are many blog posts and articles all over the Internet providing comparisons between Git and Mercurial. Most of them only briefly describe the main differences and then try to decide which one is better. However, I didn’t find many articles explaining the differences in detail from a neutral point of view and that’s what I’ll try to do here, also providing links to relevant documentation. For simple uses like a single user managing a private project, Git and Mercurial are equivalent. Their workflow differs a little due to the underlying differences, but their usage doesn’t seem to be very far apart. However, those differences start being noticeable when you collaborate with more users and, the more complex the project is, the more you will notice them. Hopefully, this information could be useful to Mercurial users wanting to know how Git works and vice versa, as well as novice users who are not using either one yet. In that case, I suggest you to experiment a little bit with both instead of trying to make a theorethical decision based on what you read in the documentation or in articles like this one. I will focus on four main aspects.

  1. The repository structure, that is, how each one of them record changes and history.
  2. The noticeable differences in how they manage the branching process.
  3. Documentation.
  4. Their two popular hosting sites, GitHub and Bitbucket.